<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The looming exit bubble of 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://discourseandnotes.com/blog/?p=876#comment-107</guid>
		<description>In a prior post on a different though related subject (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/aWHDkm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/aWHDkm&lt;/a&gt;), I discussed the subject of &quot;bubbles&quot; as follows: &quot;Bubbles don’t happen because valuations are high. Bubbles happen because valuations are in excess of what business fundamentals can reasonably justify. As the word implies, a bubble occurs when that which is solid is supplanted by air. Thus, it is quite possible for bubbles to occur even in a low valuation environment.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I understand that this is an oversimplification and raises a series of more complex questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a prior post on a different though related subject (<a href="http://bit.ly/aWHDkm" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aWHDkm</a>), I discussed the subject of &#8220;bubbles&#8221; as follows: &#8220;Bubbles don’t happen because valuations are high. Bubbles happen because valuations are in excess of what business fundamentals can reasonably justify. As the word implies, a bubble occurs when that which is solid is supplanted by air. Thus, it is quite possible for bubbles to occur even in a low valuation environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I understand that this is an oversimplification and raises a series of more complex questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidkpark</title>
		<link>http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>davidkpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://discourseandnotes.com/blog/?p=876#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Yes, but a lot this revolves around how we define a &quot;bubble&quot; and how we can see prospectively see this bubble. I know in academia how one defines a bubble is very tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but a lot this revolves around how we define a &#8220;bubble&#8221; and how we can see prospectively see this bubble. I know in academia how one defines a bubble is very tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://discourseandnotes.com/blog/?p=876#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Agreed. And the abundance of seed VC capital is arguably itself a bubble, which will require traditional VC to follow on, which will require exits as discussed... so there could be a chain reaction of bubbles that are needed. Not unlike the public market, in some ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. And the abundance of seed VC capital is arguably itself a bubble, which will require traditional VC to follow on, which will require exits as discussed&#8230; so there could be a chain reaction of bubbles that are needed. Not unlike the public market, in some ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidkpark</title>
		<link>http://www.discourseandnotes.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-looming-exit-bubble-of-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>davidkpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://discourseandnotes.com/blog/?p=876#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s why there&#039;s such a plethora of seed VC&#039;s sprouting up because the existing VC structure is broken. The huge funds raised by traditional VCs and the subsequent exits required by them are just unsustainable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#39;s why there&#39;s such a plethora of seed VC&#39;s sprouting up because the existing VC structure is broken. The huge funds raised by traditional VCs and the subsequent exits required by them are just unsustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

